Cardiopulmonary exercise testing in younger patients with persistent dyspnea following acute, outpatient COVID-19 infection.

Studies using cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) to evaluate persistent dyspnea following infection with COVID-19 have focused on older patients with co-morbid diseases who are post-hospitalization. Less attention has been given to younger patients with post-COVID-19 dyspnea treated as outpatients for their acute infection. We sought to determine causes of persistent dyspnea in younger patients recovering from acute COVID-19 infection that did not require hospitalization. We collected data on all post-COVID-19 patients who underwent CPET in our clinic in the calendar year 2021. Data on cardiac function and respiratory response were abstracted, and diagnoses were assigned using established criteria. CPET data on 45 patients (238.3 ± 124 days post-test positivity) with a median age of 27.0 (22.0-40.0) were available for analysis. All but two (95.6%) were active-duty service members. The group showed substantial loss of aerobic capacity-average VO2 peak (L/min) was 84.2 ± 23% predicted and 25 (55.2%) were below the threshold for normal. Spirometry, diffusion capacity, high-resolution computed tomography, and echocardiogram were largely normal and were not correlated with VO2 peak. The two most common contributors to dyspnea and exercise limitation following comprehensive evaluation were deconditioning and dysfunctional breathing (DB). Younger active-duty military patients with persistent dyspnea following outpatient COVID-19 infection show a substantial reduction in aerobic capacity that is not driven by structural cardiopulmonary disease. Deconditioning and DB breathing are common contributors to their exercise limitation. The chronicity and severity of symptoms accompanied by DB could be consistent with an underlying myopathy in some patients, a disorder that cannot be differentiated from deconditioning using non-invasive CPET.

Obesity-related Changes in Diffusing Capacity and Transfer Coefficient of the Lung for Carbon Monoxide and Resulting Patterns of Abnormality across Reference Equations.

Rationale: In 2017, an American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society Task Force report recommended further research on the effects that body mass index (BMI) has on diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DlCO), the transfer coefficient (Kco), and the alveolar volume (VA). Objectives: Our goals were to 1) quantify the magnitude and direction of change to measured and predicted DlCO values as BMI increases in patients free of cardiopulmonary disease and 2) identify how BMI and obesity-related changes differ by reference set. Methods: Using data from a prospective cohort study of service members free of cardiopulmonary disease, we modeled the effect that BMI has on measured values of DlCO, Kco, and VA, after adjusting for age, sex, hemoglobin (Hgb), and height. We then referenced DlCO, Kco, and VA to normal values using four different reference equations. Results: There were 380 patients with data available for analysis, and 130 had a BMI ⩾ 30 kg/m2 (87.7% class I obesity). After controlling for age, sex, Hgb, and height, increased BMI was significantly associated with Kco (ß = 0.09, P < 0.01) and VA (ß = -0.15, P < 0.01) but not DlCO. After adjustment for Hgb, for every 5-kg/m2 increase in BMI, the mean increase in percent predicted (PPD) values ranged from 4.2% to 6.5% and from 5.0% to 7.5% for DlCO and Kco, respectively; and the mean decrease in VA PPD was 3.2-4.0%. In the presence of obesity (BMI ⩾ 30 kg/m2), the prevalence of DlCO and Kco abnormalities dropped by 4.1-12.1% and 0.4-16.3%, respectively, across equations, whereas VA abnormalities increased from 7.7% to 9.9%. Eliminating 163 patients with abnormal trans-thoracic echocardiogram (TEE), high-resolution computed tomographic (HRCT) scan, or Hgb altered the magnitude of relationships, but significance was preserved. Conclusions: In an otherwise healthy population with predominantly class I obesity and normal TTE, HRCT scan, and Hgb, we found that Kco and VA were more affected by BMI than DlCO. Increases in PPD values varied across equations and were modest but significant and could change clinical decision making by reducing sensitivity for detecting gas-exchange abnormalities. BMI and obesity had the smallest effect on Global Lung Function Initiative PPD values.

Inhaled Nitric Oxide via High-Flow Nasal Cannula in Patients with Acute Respiratory Failure Related to COVID-19.

INTRODUCTION: Limited evidence exists regarding use of inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) in spontaneously breathing patients. We evaluated the effectiveness of continuous iNO via high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) in COVID-19 respiratory failure. METHODS: We performed a multicenter cohort study of patients with respiratory failure from COVID-19 managed with HFNC. Patients were stratified by administration of iNO via HFNC. Regression analysis was used to compare the need for mechanical ventilation and secondary endpoints including hospital mortality, length of stay, acute kidney injury, need for renal replacement therapy, and need for extracorporeal life support. RESULTS: A total of 272 patients were identified and 66 (24.3%) of these patients received iNO via HFNC for a median of 88 h (interquartile range: 44, 135). After 12 h of iNO, supplemental oxygen requirement was unchanged or increased in 52.7% of patients. Twenty-nine (43.9%) patients treated with iNO compared to 79 (38.3%) patients without iNO therapy required endotracheal intubation (P = .47). After multivariable adjustment, there was no difference in need for mechanical ventilation between groups (odds ratio: 1.53; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.74-3.17), however, iNO administration was associated with longer hospital length of stay (incidence rate ratio: 1.41; 95% CI: 1.31-1.51). No difference was found for mortality, acute kidney injury, need for renal replacement therapy, or need for extracorporeal life support. CONCLUSION: In patients with COVID-19 respiratory failure, iNO delivered via HFNC did not reduce oxygen requirements in the majority of patients or improve clinical outcomes. Given the observed association with increased length of stay, judicious selection of those likely to benefit from this therapy is warranted.

Optimizing routine screening for cardiac sarcoidosis through use of commonly available studies.

BACKGROUND: Sarcoidosis is a multisystem granulomatous disorder with unclear etiology. Morbidity and mortality vary based on organ involvement, with cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) associated with higher mortality; despite this, CS remains underdiagnosed. The Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) expert consensus statement recommends screening sarcoidosis patients for CS utilizing a symptom screen, EKG, and echocardiogram (TTE), while the American Thoracic Society (ATS) guideline recommends only EKG and symptom screening. These recommendations, however, are based on limited data with recommendations for further studies. RESEARCH QUESTION: The purpose is to evaluate the prevalence of abnormal screening tests in patients with sarcoidosis and the correlation of these tests with the subsequent diagnosis of CS. A specific emphasis was placed on evaluating the sensitivity of the recommendations versus the sensitivity of a modified criteria. STUDY DESIGN: and Methods: This study retrospectively evaluated a database of prospectively enrolled patients from a tertiary military academic center. All patients who underwent imaging with cardiac MRI and/or FDG-PET were identified. These results were correlated with screening studies (symptom screen, EKG, TTE, and ambulatory rhythm monitoring (ARM)) and used to calculate sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for each test. Using a clinical diagnosis of CS as the reference standard, the sensitivity and specificity of the HRS criteria were calculated and compared to a modified screening rubric developed a priori, consisting of minor changes to the criteria and the addition of ARM. RESULTS: This study evaluated 114 patients with sarcoidosis with 132 advanced imaging events, leading to a diagnosis of CS in 36 patients. Utilizing HRS screening recommendations, the sensitivity for CS was 63.9%, while the modified criteria increased sensitivity to 94.4%. INTERPRETATION: This study suggests that the HRS guidelines lack sensitivity to effectively screen for CS and that a modified screening model which includes ARM may be more effective.

Effective Use of Angiotensin II in Coronavirus Disease 19-Associated Mixed Shock State: A Case Report.

The rapid spread of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) has sparked a search for effective therapies. The discovery that the virus binds the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptor has led to investigation of the renin-angiotensin system for possible therapeutic targets. We present a case of an elderly woman with multiple comorbidities who developed severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), a cardiomyopathy, and vasodilatory shock secondary to COVID-19 and was treated with exogenous angiotensin II. She rapidly demonstrated significant hemodynamic improvement without noted adverse effects. Thus, we propose further investigation into possible benefits of angiotensin II in shock secondary to COVID-19.